Claremore Daily Progress

Letters to the Editor

July 13, 2010

LETTER: What’s the deal with the Missouri Street closing?

CLAREMORE — Rogers County has requested that the City of Claremore close Missouri Street from 1st Street (southern border) to Patti Page (Northern Border) for the new County Courthouse project. Despite the perceived contention over the request, the City of Claremore is not opposed to doing this as long as the county is willing to assume the costs and due diligence of making it happen.

Closing a street isn’t as easy as putting up a few barricades. Many things are involved in permanently closing even that small section of Missouri Street.

All utilities, except stormwater, will have to be vacated by the City. The City of Claremore will also have to legally give up all current and future rights to the property and transfer ownership of the land to the County.

These are things that cannot be done overnight as they have to be publicly posted and published for adequate amounts of time to allow for citizen input. All property owners near the area that will be closed have to be notified and a public hearing has to be set in order for them to voice their concerns.

The City has approved that hearing date to be August 16, which will allow the necessary amount of time for proper legal notification.

The biggest hang-up in this project was the stormwater system. It was first believed it would need to be moved and the County saw this as a cost to the City.

Estimates came in at about $3 million to complete this project. A visual inspection was done to ensure the stormwater system was adequate and in good repair, and it was. Additionally, the stormwater study showed that both the size and condition of the lines were adequate. This negated the County’s claims that the “City had to do it anyway” and moved the closure from a $3 million dollar project to about a $20,000 one.

Once that issue was resolved, the County Commissioners were notified and they accepted that any damage or relocation of the lines is at a full cost to the County.

At that point in the process, it was the responsibility of the County to make formal request and follow the statutes for closing a road. Because the process had to be started by County staff, not the City, the delay in action at that point was because of the County. While it was talked about many times, the process was not officially started until July 6, one month after the stormwater issue was decided at the first meeting in June. Once the County began following proper procedures to request the road closing and notify all utilities, the public hearing could be set.

The public voted to approve the construction of the new County Courthouse. It is the belief of City Administration, that all costs associated with building the Courthouse should come from the funds approved by the people.

City officials would have no reason to close Missouri Street if it were not for the County project and therefore feel that all costs including vacating utilities, public notice, any needed reworking of traffic lights and manpower associated with all of the above should be included in the costs to the County, not to the City. The City expects the cost of closing the street to be approximately $20,000, which in relation to the cost of the County’s entire project, is not much. But for the City, which did not receive any revenue benefit through the vote of the people on the project, the costs would negatively affect the budget.

The bottom line is that the City of Claremore is absolutely willing to close Missouri Street for Rogers County. This project is in no way connected to the traffic loop study project the City and County are also currently working on together.

If no other issues arise from the public meeting, the street closing is expected to be approved at the council meeting on August 16.


Cassie Woods is Marketing and Public Relations Director for the City of Claremore. 

Text Only
Letters to the Editor
  • LETTER: Back to School drive helps area students

    As a new school year approaches, Rogers County children and their parents are shopping to replace outgrown clothing as well as purchasing the required classroom supplies to start out the year ready to learn.

    July 21, 2013

  • LETTER - Commissioners need to take initiative and retool road fund

    Dear Editor:

    It is so disheartening to read the positive stories about Tulsa County Commissioners and then have to stomach the actions of a couple of our current Rogers County Commissioners and several of the past ones. 

    September 20, 2012

  • Letter - District 2 residents are getting exactly what they asked for

    Dear Editor:

    A few years ago, Robin Anderson was paid to attend classes for which she had no  requirement to attend. Just to further her education at our expense. If your facts are correct, District 2 Commisioner Helm now has:

    September 18, 2012

  • CJ 2011-28






    January 26, 2012

  • PB-2011-58


    November 11, 2011

  • Keystone Pipeline project will bring more jobs, revenues

    Dear Editor,
    As a lifelong Oklahoma resident, I feel the need to write concerning the approval process of the Keystone XL Pipeline project. As I am sure you are aware this project is awaiting a Presidential permit for the pipeline to cross the U.S./Canada border.

    September 9, 2011

  • Floral arrangement missing from Woodlawn Cemetery

    Dear Editor,
    On Tuesday, Aug. 16, my son and I went to Woodlawn Cemetery to place a floral arrangement on my husband’s grave to commemorate the second anniversary of his passing.
    We placed the saddle arrangement on his headstone shortly before 2 p.m.

    September 7, 2011

  • Freedmen should be Cherokee citizens

    To the Cherokee Nations citizens, government officials and chief. I am a Cherokee Freedman. I live in Claremore, Oklahoma. I have been hearing all the decisions about the Freedman citizenship.

    August 26, 2011

  • CCVB clarifies $200K hotel incentive; reader writes about volunteering

    Two letters on 8/7/11

    August 8, 2011

  • Duty and rest rules for commercial pilots delayed

    Dear Editor,
    I’ve read, with interest, Andy Pasztor’s r article in the 02 August edition of the WSJ on the latest delay in the publication of a final rule to update the decades-old duty and rest rules for most commercial flight operations. It has to be a great challenge to take a complex technical issue and reduce it to understandable terms for a general readership. 

    August 4, 2011