Published October 10, 2008 11:42 am - U.S. Rep. Dan Boren of Oklahoma told Claremore business leaders this week that he believes without the $700 billion rescue plan, the American economy would collapse resulting in millions of jobs lost.
“This is real,” he said. “We’re talking the Great Depression if nothing was done. This is a very difficult time for our country.”
Boren says vote for bailout plan was necessary to save country
By Joy Hampton
CLAREMORE DAILY PROGRESS
October 10, 2008
—
U.S. Rep. Dan Boren of Oklahoma told Claremore business leaders this week that he believes without the $700 billion rescue plan, the American economy would collapse resulting in millions of jobs lost.
“This is real,” he said. “We’re talking the Great Depression if nothing was done. This is a very difficult time for our country.”
The congressman said the nation’s exposure is “up to $60 trillion.”
“This is a very complex problem that affects everyone,” said Boren. “Four- to five-million jobs could be lost in six months.”
During the 10-day period in which Congress was considering Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson’s emergency bailout proposal, Boren said calls from his constituents were 400 to 1 against the plan.
“The calls were not pretty,” Boren said “People were rightfully angry.”
Despite those calls, Boren voted for the plan that was signed into law one week ago. The congressman said the matter is so serious that he voted for the legislation despite public opinion against it. That fact should convey to the public how critical the economic situation is right now, he said.
Boren said the problem started following the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center. Stocks went down, and Alan Greenspan said there was a need to make the U.S. economy more liquid. In response to this, there was a move to make housing more affordable.
What Boren didn’t say was that the push for more and better housing for people at all economic levels had started earlier, under the Clinton administration. Following 9-11 and the resulting stock market dips, the housing push grew stronger.
Subprime lending, or higher risk loans, made it easier for those who needed it most, seniors on limited incomes and families with children, to obtain housing.
Information available on the Housing and Urban Development Web site document this trend, and the regulation designed to protect consumers from “predatory lenders.” Some of that legislation was later revoked, further deregulating an industry that was already finding ways to fly under the regulation radar by creating what Boren described as “new products” such as the Credit Default Swap.
The subprime lending push meant people who were denied mortgages by traditional banks could now obtain an adjusted rate mortgage through mortgage companies. The problem was, those companies and their agents, spurred by incentives and high profit margins, made loans to people who really couldn’t afford them.
The companies sold those risky mortgages to banks and institutions that were more than willing to buy them in bulk.
Freddy Mac, Fannie Mae and others were buying and selling mortgage-backed securities in volume.
Housing values continued to rise, and things seemed to be going well.